Redefine rape, huh? I think these ‘men’ need to have a vagina for 2 months and dropped in the Congo or Darfur where women experience rape on a daily basis. The article begins; “Drugged, raped, and pregnant? Too bad. Republicans are pushing to limit rape and incest cases eligible for government abortion funding.” There should never be a ‘game changer’ when it comes to rape or the woman’s right to choice should she experience something so horrific as rape. It continues on; “Rape is only really rape if it involves force. So says the new House Republican majority as it now moves to change abortion law.” So incest is not force? This is a disgusting consideration and they should all be ashamed for contemplating it especially when you dig and find that during 2006, there were less than 200 tax funded abortions due to incest, welfare of the mother or [the current definition of] rape. That basically comes to about less than .1 cent per tax payer! So what is this “Act/Bill” really about? They’ll examine ways to ‘reduce’ spending for this but not a war which costs $720 million per day? Click HERE to read the full article. $720 million per day is really something to mull over, isn’t it?