…believe the 9/11 buildings came down because of the planes. Seriously– it bugs me that some people can accept that we collectively have been duped while others can’t see it at all. I now think I finally understand why! The reason people can’t believe in the controlled demolition ‘theory’ is because they’ve never witnessed buildings such as WTC 1 AND 2 withstand a fire and not come down! Or better yet, they’ve forgotten recent and past history. But think about this– the third building, #7, actually did come down through controlled demolition.
Since we don’t (seem to) have an example in our minds (aside from movies and tv’s influence on us) we earnestly believe that the buildings could have come down by those two planes. Here’s a bit history to help us see those buildings actually should have withstood both planes. Excuse me, both of those punk azz planes.
Example: Meridian Plaza in Philly burned (much like the images ingrained in our minds about 9/11) for 19 hours.
Think about that moment. To logically think that the Plaza’s frame could sustain itself (because it was built to do so) but two of this country’s landmarks (not just because of 9/11– check it’s history for the ones that don’t know) couldn’t survive two measly little planes and both punk azz fires that barely lasted 2 hours each? People– it doesn’t not compute. Below is First Interstate Bank Fire in Los Angeles:
Now… do we really have to be an architect or understand construction or have a degree in engineering? For ‘shits and giggiles’ here’s another:
That’s another building that took on fire and “whooped fires azz”. Parque Central South Tower Fire in Caracas, Venezuela is recent history for ya’ too. Here’s another shot of just how fire (or planes for that matter) are [structurally] incapable of taking down these mighty structures:
In short, these two bad muthafukas should still be standing, period: